Do We Have Free Will?
You feel like you make choices. But if the brain follows physical laws, are your choices already determined?
The Problem
Determinism: Every event, including brain states, is caused by prior events according to natural laws.
If determinism is true, your "decisions" were fixed by conditions before you were born.
The conflict: We hold people morally responsible for choices. But how can you be responsible for something you couldn't have done differently?
Major Positions
#### Hard Determinism
Free will is an illusion. Our choices are determined by prior causes. Moral responsibility is incoherent.
"You couldn't have done otherwise."
#### Libertarian Free Will
We have genuine free will that escapes determinism. Perhaps quantum indeterminacy or non-physical minds create room for freedom.
Problem: Randomness doesn't equal control. And non-physical minds seem to violate physics.
#### Compatibilism
Free will and determinism are compatible. Free will means acting according to your own desires without external coercion — whether those desires are determined or not.
"You are free when you do what you want, even if what you want is determined."
Most philosophers today are compatibilists.
Scientific Perspectives
Libet experiments (1980s): Brain activity predicting a decision occurs before the conscious feeling of deciding. Does this disprove free will?
Critics respond: The experiments may show when consciousness reports a decision, not when it's made.
Neuroscience: Brain imaging can predict simple choices before people report them. But complex choices remain unpredictable.
Practical Implications
- We still experience choosing
- Consequences still shape behavior
- Society still needs accountability systems
Perhaps the question isn't whether free will is "real," but whether the concept is useful.
Related Reading
Listen to the Full Course
Explore big questions in Philosophical Questions.